|
|
|
Monster Cable MV3CV-2M Monster Video 3 2-meter High-Resolution Component Video Cable
|
|
|
Large Photo
|
High resolution component video cable for the best possible picture.
Nitrogen cellular dielectric for low attenuation and high velocity signal transfer.
Metal-to-metal double shield for maximum rejection of RFI and EMI.
24k gold contact RCA connectors for superior conductivity.
Heavy duty strain relief
Average Customer Rating: 
UPC: 050644227998
List price: $89.95
|
|
|
Showing page 1 of 3
|
|
|
|
Reviews
|
|
 Great, May 12, 2007
|
|
|
Bought these for my DVD player to output 480p as my player does not have HDMI. Noticed a difference immediately, and with a price like this for Monster, you can't go wrong. If you shop around, you don't have to spend much for good cables like these.
|
|
Great cable and price!, February 24, 2006
|
|
|
Great price on this cable. Just as good as the THX Ultra 800 without paying extra for the THX name. HUGE difference over S-video! Better than cheap cables too. Don't skimp on cables by buying cheap ones. If you can't see the difference, get glasses or better TV! Best cables w/o paying a fortune!
|
|
 Whoa!!! Apples and Oranges, January 12, 2005
|
|
|
Several reviews mention the improvement when these cables to replace a composite (L/R audio + video) cable, or an S-video (multi-pinned plug). ALmost all of that improvement is due to the fact that these cable connection methods are completely different types in signal format and the TV uses different internal circuitry for each one. Virtually any S-video cable connection will give a better image than a composite type cable, and any component (individual R-G-B video) connection will be better than S-video. Cable brand has absolutely nothing to do with it. There may be some difference between one brand of component cable and another, but its almost always unnoticable.
|
|
 What's your budget?, September 1, 2004
|
|
|
Do you own a 27 inch TV with a $27 DVD player? Don't bother. Do you own a $5000 amp, a $3000 DVD player, and a set of speakers that you might bury yourself in? Don't bother buying, unless you want to burn money. Monster may look pretty, and the performance of Monster vs. no name is certainly proven in the quantifiable scientific analysis...but your ear can't hear it.
Simply put, buy comparable cables with and without the Monster name and run a test with your ears. You will probably find that you can save yourself significant $ by purchasing equally constructed cabling without the Monster name...
|
|
Top Notch Cable, August 5, 2004
|
|
|
This is a great video cable, though it's very spendy. Superior to composite & S Video. Monster classifies it as "ultimate performance". I'd say only DVI & HDMI, which are both digital, are better. I needed a 2M or 6.5' cable because the 1M was just too short for my needs. I looked at this one (90$) and Monster's new THX Ulta 1000 4' component cable(100$). They had equal features. The THX cable is better looking than this one, however when it came down to it I didn't want to spend 10 extra bucks on a cable that's 2.5' shorter! Now this cable isn't THX certified, but it is certified by Imaging Science Foundation. I typically recommend Monster Cable, I feel they are the leader in A/V cables. This is a great fit for a progressive scan DVD player and/or HDTV. Get the most out of what you paid for! Rock On.
|
|
|
|
Reviews
