|
Browse |
| Compare Prices |
| Product Description |
| Similar Products |
 Reviews
|
|
Buy Now |
|
|
$12.98 |
|
|
$14.51 |
|
|
$13.89 |
|
|
$14.99 |
|
|
$14.99 |
|
|
$15.19 |
|
|
$16.99 |
|
Similar Products |
 |
Bach: Partitas Nos. 2-4 |
||
 |
Schoenberg Violin Concerto Op.36/Sibelius Violin Concerto Op.47 |
||
 |
Bach Fugues by Emerson String Quartet, Bach |
||
 |
Bach: The Art of Fugue by Johann Sebastian Bach, Emerson String Quarte... |
||
 |
The Rest Is Noise: Listening to the Twentieth Century by Alex Ross |
||
|
|||
Bach: Art of Fugue |
|||
|
 |
||
|
|
 |
Showing page 1 of 2 |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
||
| First | Previous | Next | Last |
 Still unhappy; still waiting to hear from Amazon, July 8, 2008 |
|
I returned this item for an exchange, since many of the pages were printed upside down, on 5/27 after following the directions for a return/replacement. It is now 7/09 and I am still waiting for a replacement. I have written twice to the dealer as well as to Amazon including one yesterday. I am tired of reviewing and would like very much for my son to to begin playing Bach. If anyone who actually reads this is in a position to make that happen!
MB |
|
great playing but harsh sound, May 8, 2008 |
|
I admire Aimard's playing ever since I heard him live several years back, and he never disappointed me with each of his new recordings, except this one. His playing is still excellent, but I didn't like the sound on the CD, which seems harsher than any of his previous CDs. I wonder if it's because the piano he's playing on or the overly done sound engineering during the recording. Aimard's playing is always marked by his clarity and liquid tone quality even with the most demanding passages. On this CD however, the clarity is still there but I somehow find the tone quality a little irritating to hear. |
 Aimard's Art of the FUgue, April 23, 2008 |
|
If you cannot live without Bach, you should not live without this recording of the Art of the FUgue by Pierre-Laurent Aimard |
|
Satisfactory..., April 20, 2008 |
|
.
This new release of Bach's Art of Fugue is good; adequate; satisfactory. I do hope people will enjoy it, and that it may be a good introduction to esoteric art. Bach's recherché Art of Fugue is cerebral, purely abstract art which can really only be fully apprehended by viewing the orthography of Bach's text: in other words, it looks better in the mind's eye than it sounds to the physical ear. Withal, it's pretty dry stuff. Aimard's realization here is--to be brutally honest--drier than is even necessary; still, it's not at all bad, though there are better. Enjoy this issue, and for the absolute finest too seek: Bach: Die Kunst der Fugue Bach: The Art of the Fugue, BWV 1080 (Excerpts); Prelude and Fugue on Bach, BWV 898 Art of the Fugue - 70th Anniversary Edition Bach: Art of Fugue, BWV 1080 Vol Bach: The Art of Fugue Bach: Die Kunst der Fuge Bach: The Art of Fugue, Vol. 1 Bach: The Art of Fugue, Vol. 2 Bach: The Organ Works (Box Set) . |
 Professional but not transcendent..., April 5, 2008 |
|
If I have to pick a performance on Piano, Glenn Gould's recording, incomplete though it is, remains my favorite. After that, Feltsman's remains my preferred. I also have Sokolov, but Feltsman, to my ears, brings more joy where there is joy, and more sorrow where there is sorrow. Sokolov's playing is cleaner, more Gould-like, but without Gould's intense "romanticism" or emotional investment. Feltsman is also a more idiosyncratic pianist, willing to inflect the music with his own personality. Sometimes he does so to a fault, as with his recording of Bach's Goldberg Variations, which I wouldn't recommend.
One of my favorites is Contrapunctus 9. Feltsman digs into the fugue with all the gusto of Gould's famous performance on the organ. Sokolov's performance of the same piece is slower and comes with a sense of detachment - a little too studied. Aimard's rendition takes a similarly happy pace to Gould and Feltsman, but it is oddly monochromatic. The sense of an overarching direction or drama is missing, and this is the feeling that much of Aimard's performances leave me with. I have no doubt that he can conceive of the piece in its entirety, but somehow he doesn't translate that in his playing. The sum does not exceed its parts. The other element that I miss in Aimard's playing is idiosyncrasy. Each of his fingers strikes the keys with the sort of pearled consistency that is the mark, not of the artist, but of the professional. I miss the unexpected turns of phrases and emphasis that are the hallmarks of a Gould and, to a degree, Feltsman. |
| First | Previous | Next | Last |